The bottomless money pit that is ATCL

The bottomless money pit that is ATCL

If a song was ever to be written and sung as a prelude to the annual presentation of reports by the Controller and Auditor General (CAG), the name, Air Tanzania Company Limited (ATCL), would, undoubtedly, be the main feature of the chorus. How could it not be, given its notoriety for huge losses? On March 28, 2024, The Citizen reported, “Air Tanzania leads loss-making parastatals despite government investment.”

ATCL is not bashful; it also leads as a recipient of government handouts. In the last eight years, ATCL has gobbled down government subsidies amounting to at least Sh3.63 trillion (about $1.4 billion), with no signs that its thirst for more taxpayers’ money has been quenched. It has been like pouring water on the hot Sahara Desert sand.

It is important to note that the billions of shillings of subsidies being poured into ATCL benefit mostly the affluent and people of better means, and not the poor. The poor can hardly afford bus fares, let alone airfares.

The trend of ATCL’s losses is shocking, to say the least – Sh23.6 billion, Sh35.24 billion, and Sh56.64 billion in financial years 2020/21, 2021/22, and 2022/23, respectively. As astounding as these numbers might be, they do not actually reveal the full magnitude of losses.

This is because there are some hidden costs to taxpayers that cannot be discovered even by the most thorough investigation and auditing by the CAG.

For example, during President Magufuli’s reign, government employees (and CCM officials) were required, not officially, but the message was clear, to use Air Tanzania for all domestic business trips.

That meant Air Tanzania had monopoly power with respect to trips by government employees. Most likely airfares for those employees were higher than what they would have paid to travel with private airlines. That is an example of an additional cost to tax payers that is too subtle to be captured by CAG’s investigations.

In the last few years, the government of Tanzania has been on a shopping spree for new aircraft, supposedly, to expand services and reverse the trend of ATCL’s losses. Yet, the end to these losses is nowhere in sight. A standard response from ATCL about losses is that investments (in new aircraft) will produce profits in the long-run. A typical response from the government about the losses is usually to fire the head of ATCL and make some tough statements about oversight.

A famous quote by John Maynard Keynes, one of the most influential economists, is that, “in the long-run we are all dead.” Air Tanzania may have a different notion of what long-run means, but it has never made a profit since it was established in 1977. It failed to do so even when it had a pure monopoly in domestic flights, in the late 1970s and 1980s.

Instead, its monopoly power made it notoriously inefficient. At that time, ATCL was nick-named, “air labda” (air maybe). The flight schedules meant absolutely nothing.

The standard response when you asked about a delay, when you could find someone to ask, was, “hatujui ndege itakuja saa ngapi” (we don’t know what time the plane will get here). More than 45 years later, we are still waiting for those profits that were to be generated in the long run. Don’t hold your breath!

Frequent firing of ATCL’s leaders by the government is like putting “a bandage on a bullet wound.” Essentially, it is scapegoating a few individuals to give the public an impression that something is being done to address the problem. But this is not the case. ATCL is not run as a for profit company and these losses should not be treated as a surprise. They are not one person’s fault.

To make ATCL a profit-making company, it needs to be privatised. It may sound radical, but it is the only way this company can be run efficiently.

A joint venture solution was tried in the 1990s with South African Airways, but it proved to be a disaster.

Of course, the privatisation process cannot be rushed and it must be transparent. The contract should be drawn carefully to make sure that privatization promotes competition, instead of stifling it, in the airline industry.

If ATCL is kept as a government parastatal (or parasite, considering its losses) as a matter of national pride, then there is no need to complain about losses.

Instead, losses should be considered the price that the nation is willing to pay for its pride. However, taxpayers should be clear that ATCL is a bottomless money pit.

Richard Mshomba is Professor Emeritus of Economics at La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA. [email protected]

Original Media Source

Share this news

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

This Year's Most Read News Stories

Britam half-year net profit hits Sh2bn on higher investment income
Tanzania Foreign Investment News
Chief Editor

Britam half-year net profit hits Sh2bn on higher investment income

Insurer and financial services provider Britam posted a 22.5 percent jump in net earnings for the half-year ended June 2024, to Sh2 billion, buoyed by increased investment income.

The rise in half-year net profit from Sh1.64 billion posted in a similar period last year came on the back of net investment income rising 2.5 times to Sh13.27 billion from Sh5.3 billion.

“We are confident in the growth and performance trend that Britam has achieved, supported by its subsidiaries in Kenya and the region. Our business is expanding its revenue base while effectively managing costs,” Britam Chief Executive Officer Tom Gitogo said.

“Our customer-centric approach is fueling growth in our customer base and product uptake, particularly through micro-insurance, partnerships, and digital channels.”

The investment income growth was fueled by interest and dividend income rising 34 percent to Sh9.1 billion, which the insurer attributed to growth in revenue and the gains from the realignment of the group’s investment portfolio.

Britam also booked a Sh3.79 billion gain on financial assets at a fair value, compared with a Sh1.8 billion loss posted in a similar period last year.

The increased investment income helped offset the 12.7 percent decline in net insurance service result to Sh2.13 billion in the wake of claims paid out rising at a faster pace than that of premiums received.

Britam said insurance revenue, which is money from written premiums, increased to Sh17.8 billion from Sh16.6 billion, primarily driven by growth in the Kenya insurance business and regional general insurance businesses, which contributed 30 percent of the revenue.

The group has a presence in seven countries in Africa namely Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, South Sudan, Mozambique, and Malawi.

Britam’s insurance service expense hit Sh13.6 billion from Sh11.3 billion, while net insurance finance expenses rose 2.6 times to Sh12.3 billion during the same period.

“Net insurance finance expenses increased mainly due to growth in interest cost for the deposit administration business driven by better investment performance. This has also been impacted by a decline in the yield curve, which has led to an increase in the insurance contract liabilities. The increase has been offset by a matching increase in fair value gain on assets,” said Britam.

Britam’s growth in profit is in line with that of other Nairobi Securities Exchange-listed insurers, which have seen a rise in profits.

Jubilee Holdings net profit in the six months increased by 22.7 percent to Sh2.5 billion on increased income from insurance, helping the insurer maintain Sh2 per share interim dividend.

CIC Insurance Group posted a 0.64 percent rise in net profit to Sh709.99 million in the same period as net earnings of Liberty Kenya nearly tripled to Sh632 million from Sh213 million, while Sanlam Kenya emerged from a loss to post a Sh282.2 million net profit.

Continue Reading