The President’s desire to facilitate investment attraction and create a conducive business environment has been bolstered by the implementation of the blueprint for regulatory reforms to improve the business environment (“Blueprint”) which aims to address challenges facing the business community. Further, we have witnessed amendments introduced in the recent fiscal budget aiming to champion investment attraction aspiration that includes VAT exemptions, income tax exemptions on strategic investment projects and remission of excise duty for materials used in the execution of strategic investment projects, to name a few.
In that same spirit, the Government recently announced that it has signed an agreement with United Arab Emirates (UAE) to address double taxation on businesses between the two countries dubbed “Agreement on Avoidance of Double Taxation and Prevention of Fiscal Evasion on Income Taxes” famously known as Double Tax Agreements (DTA’s) or Double Tax Treaties (DTT’s). This DTA is an addition to nine other similar arrangements that Tanzania has signed with states such as Canada, Denmark, Finland, India, Italy, Norway, South Africa, Sweden and Zambia.
DTA’s simply aim to allocate taxing rights between the host country and home country in the context of the income earned by respective person or entity. For example, if, company “A” which is a South Africa based entity intends to invest in Tanzania by commencing manufacturing activities, the DTA between South Africa and Tanzania will allocate taxing rights on the business income earned by company “A” through its manufacturing activities in Tanzania. Therefore, such income will only be taxed in Tanzania upon prevalence of certain conditions meaning the same won’t be double taxed in South Africa.
In essence, the DTA’s simply aim to promote investment opportunities between the two contracting states. Such arrangements facilitate flow of investment between partnering states. The question here is on whether the current DTA’s between Tanzania and other contracting states fully reflect the investment attraction aspiration and whether such DTA’s fully serve their purpose of eliminating double taxation and prevention of fiscal evasion on income taxes.
If not, then what should be done to ensure that the said DTA’s fully reflect the desire to promote investment? There is also the issue of relevancy to the current business environment since most DTA’s were signed as far back as 1968.
It would be good to also examine the recurring dispute between the Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) and taxpayers in relation to the said DTA’s. For instance, with regards to the DTA between Tanzania and South Africa, the dispute has been on interpretation of Article 7 which provides for taxation of business profits and specifically the issue has been on whether service fees are part of the envisaged business profits.
In short, Article 7 of DTA provides that the profits of an enterprise of a contracting state shall only be taxable in that state unless the enterprise carries on business in the other state through a permanent establishment situated therein.
Therefore, this means that South African based entity operating in Tanzania without a permanent establishment in the country, will have its business profits taxed only in South Africa (SA).
The divergence between TRA and taxpayers has been whether the service fee earned by such SA based entity operating without a permanent establishment in the country is part of the envisaged business profits under Article 7 of the DTA.
Taxpayers understood that such service fees form part of the business profits hence should only be taxed in the home country of the service provider, meaning no withholding tax (WHT) should be applied on the same. The taxman’s position is that such service fees are not part of the business profits hence WHT should be applied on the same.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania (“Court”) shed some light on the dispute through its rulings in tax appeal No. 265 of 2021 between Mlimani Holdings Limited and Commissioner General (TRA), tax appeal No. 218 of 2019 between Kilombero Sugar Company Limited and Commissioner General (TRA) and tax appeal No. 430 of 2020 between Mantra Tanzania Limited and Commissioner General (TRA).
In the aforesaid tax appeals, the Court interpreted the Article 7 of the DTA by holding that service fees are not part of the business profits envisaged under the Article and therefore such fees should be taxed in Tanzania by way of WHT mechanism.
It is fair to say that the Court has effectively discharged its task by interpreting the tax statutes as well as tax related agreements in this case the DTA’s. However, one needs to consider the potential implications of such decision to the investment prospects and what might be the best way forward on the same.
Most stakeholders are of the view that such decision will likely have a negative effect on the flow of investment into the country due to potential increase of operational costs to the investors.
On the issue of relevancy, it has been claimed severally that DTA’s might not reflect the current business and investment environment since most of them were signed as far back as 1968 with the most recent one signed in 1995 (Canada) prior to the UAE DTA.
Therefore, as we strive to bolster investment attraction and create a conducive business environment, it is imperative to align the DTA’s to fully reflect such aspirations by reviewing, revisiting and redrafting (if necessary) all articles that directly or indirectly impede the flow of investment opportunities to our country as well as re-negotiating all irrelevant articles to align them with the current business environment.
In conclusion, the Government should consult tax stakeholders and the business community on their views on how best to improve DTA’s in order to promote investment attraction and the states that the Government should prioritize signing DTA’s with.
Share this news
This Year’s Most Read News Stories
Tanzania readying to talk to British developer over Zanzibar land lease revocation
Dar es Salaam. British firm Pennyroyal Limited has said it will sue the Tanzanian government over leasehold revocation in Zanzibar, but the Attorney General has confirmed that they are preparing to meet with the investor.Continue Reading
Tanzania Declares Marburg Outbreak – Africa CDC Mobilizes Immediate Response
Addis Ababa, January 20, 2025</Strong> — Tanzania has declared a Marburg virus disease (MVD) outbreak after confirming one case and identifying 25 suspected cases in the Kagera Region of Northwestern Tanzania. The Marburg virus, a highly infectious and often fatal disease, is similar to Ebola and is transmitted to humans from fruit bats and monkeys. This outbreak marks the nation’s second encounter with the deadly virus, following the outbreak in Bukoba District of Kagera Region in March 2023, which resulted in nine cases and six deaths.
In response to this urgent threat, the Africa CDC is mobilizing strong support to help Tanzania contain the outbreak. A team of twelve public health experts will be deployed as part of an advance mission in the next 24 hours. The multidisciplinary team includes epidemiologists, risk communication, infection prevention and control (IPC), and laboratory experts to provide on-ground support for surveillance, IPC, diagnostics, and community engagement.
The Director-General of Africa CDC, Dr. Jean Kaseya, has engaged with Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu Hassan and the Minister of Health to ensure coordinated efforts and secure political commitment for the response.
“Africa CDC stands firmly with Tanzania in this critical moment. To support the government’s efforts, we are committing US$ 2 million to bolster immediate response measures, including deploying public health experts, strengthening diagnostics, and enhancing case management. Building on Tanzania’s commendable response during the 2023 outbreak, we are confident that swift and decisive action, combined with our support and those of other partners, will bring this outbreak under control,” Dr. Kaseya stated.
Africa CDC has recently supported efforts to enhance the diagnostic and sequencing capacity of public health laboratories in Tanzania. PCR Test kits and genomic sequencing reagents have been dispatched, with additional supplies in the pipeline. To ensure rapid identification and confirmation of cases, the institution will also provide technical assistance to strengthen detection and genome sequencing for better characterization of the pathogen. Additionally, support will be provided to improve case management protocols and enhance the capacity to deliver safe and effective treatment.
Africa CDC is committed to working closely with the Government of Tanzania, regional partners, international organizations, and global stakeholders, including the World Health Organization, to stop the spread of the Marburg virus.
Source: allafrica.com
Will Tanzania agree to Starlink Internet Service?
Will the Tanzania government let Starlink, the world-famous internet service provider, operate in the country?Continue Reading