Protectionism, taxes, fuel: The high cost of air travel in Africa

Protectionism, taxes, fuel: The high cost of air travel in Africa

Travelling 1,000 kilometres (620 miles) by air between two capitals on the same continent does not seem like a challenge. But it can be one in Africa.

Take Libreville and Bangui for instance. The journey takes a minimum of nine hours, requires passengers to change planes and shell out $1,000 — an example of the challenges facing Africa’s aviation sector because of high taxes and protectionist policies.

In comparison, a flight between Paris and Madrid — which crosses an equivalent distance — takes two hours and costs five times less.

Unlike Europe, “travel on the continent is very difficult”, said Moses Munga, a 27-year-old construction consultant on his way to Ghana from Nairobi.

Like Munga, who told AFP that work took him to West Africa several times a year, civil engineer Ahmed Mekewi said he was a frequent business traveller.

But he confided: “I would have difficulty travelling on my own.”

“The cost of travelling in Africa is very challenging,” the 29-year-old said.

Unlike Europe, which liberalised its aviation sector in the 1990s, Africa does not have “a unified… market”, an expert in the sector told AFP.

“In Europe, Air France for example can make as many flights as it wants, to Germany, Belgium, Spain or Portugal. This freedom… does not exist within Africa” for African carriers, he said, requesting anonymity because of the nature of his work.

Restricted traffic rights granted by African governments to airlines limit the number of direct routes and the frequency of flights, and make journeys longer across the 54-nation continent, he added.

According to a study conducted in 2021 by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) for the African Union, out of the 1,431 possible connections between each of the bloc’s member states, only 19 percent had a weekly direct flight.

‘Protectionist mechanisms’ 

“Protectionist mechanisms favouring local airlines such as charging foreign companies more for flying over or operating inside their territory… hampers competition and drives prices up,” said Linden Birns, an aviation consultant based in South Africa.

As a result, “air traffic is so expensive in Africa (that) it isn’t really growing. Routes are very thinly served,” said Guy Leitch, aeronautical analyst and publisher of the South African magazine SA Flyer.

According to IATA, “Africa is the region where airfares are by far the highest”.

In addition to government restrictions, the price of intra-African air travel is also affected by “very high” taxes and the cost of aviation fuel, said Robert Lisinge, head of the energy, infrastructure and services section at the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA).

Africa’s low refining capacity means that aviation fuel is largely imported and “often 30 percent more expensive than elsewhere, including in… oil-producing countries,” said the expert source.

The Yamoussoukro Decision — a 1999 treaty intended to pave the way for the liberalisation of Africa’s aviation sector — was followed by the Single African Air Transport Market (SAATM) project in 2018.

But such ambitions have struggled to take off.

“The whole idea is that if you liberalise the market, it will increase connectivity and it will reduce costs,” Lisinge told AFP.

But bilateral air service agreements between countries mean that many companies are unable to operate flights “as many times as they want, using the planes of whichever capacity they choose”, he added.

 Economic gains 

A 2014 IATA study covering 12 African nations said liberalisation would cause air traffic to jump 81 percent between these countries.

Removing market barriers between just a dozen countries would generate $1.3 billion in additional economic activity and help create 155,000 jobs, the study concluded.

For now, “regional travel across the continent is very challenging and makes business hard”, said construction consultant Munga.

“Once you get a client and are drawing up your quotation, you must consider the costly cost of travel,” he said, adding that high airfares sometimes made a contract too expensive for certain customers, forcing him to abandon business opportunities.

For UNECA’s Lisinge, the continent stands to lose out on crucial economic gains unless air travel is made easier.

“Africa is a vast continent, connectivity by road is relatively poor,” he pointed out.

“Air transport is necessary to move the perishable goods, the traders, the expertise that will be required for intra-African trade”.

Original Media Source

Share this news

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

This Year's Most Read News Stories

Tanzania Declares End of Marburg Virus Disease Outbreak
Tanzania Foreign Investment News
Chief Editor

Tanzania Declares End of Marburg Virus Disease Outbreak

Tanzania Declares End of Marburg Virus Disease Outbreak

Tanzania today declared the end of Marburg virus disease outbreak after recording no new cases over 42 days since the death of the last confirmed case on 28 January 2025.

The outbreak, in which two confirmed and eight probable cases were recorded (all deceased), was the second the country has experienced. Both this outbreak, which was declared on 20 January 2025, and the one in 2023 occurred in the north-eastern Kagera region.

In response to the latest outbreak, Tanzania’s health authorities set up coordination and response systems, with support from World Health Organization (WHO) and partners, at the national and regional levels and reinforced control measures to swiftly detect cases, enhance clinical care, infection prevention as well as strengthen collaboration with communities to raise awareness and help curb further spread of the virus.

Growing expertise in public health emergency response in the African region has been crucial in mounting effective outbreak control measures. Drawing on experience from the response to the 2023 Marburg virus disease outbreak, WHO worked closely with Tanzanian health authorities to rapidly scale up key measures such as disease surveillance and trained more than 1000 frontline health workers in contact tracing, clinical care and public health risk communication. The Organization also delivered over five tonnes of essential medical supplies and equipment.

“The dedication of frontline health workers and the efforts of the national authorities and our partners have paid off,” said Dr Charles Sagoe-Moses, WHO Representative in Tanzania. “While the outbreak has been declared over, we remain vigilant to respond swiftly if any cases are detected and are supporting ongoing efforts to provide psychosocial care to families affected by the outbreak.”

Building on the momentum during the acute phase of the outbreak response, measures have been put in place to reinforce the capacity of local health facilities to respond to potential future outbreaks. WHO and partners are procuring additional laboratory supplies and other equipment for disease detection and surveillance and other critical services.

Marburg virus disease is highly virulent and causes haemorrhagic fever. It belongs to the same family as the virus that causes Ebola virus disease. Illness caused by Marburg virus begins abruptly. Patients present with high fever, severe headache and severe malaise. They may develop severe haemorrhagic symptoms within seven days.

In the African region, previous outbreaks and sporadic cases have been reported in Angola, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Equatorial Guinea, Rwanda, South Africa and Uganda.

Source: allafrica.com

Continue Reading