Economic conditions and gender-based violence

Economic conditions and gender-based violence

By Khadija Mrisho

Economic gender-based violence entails, among other things, restricting access to and ownership of resources. It also expands to include exclusion in decision making regarding the use and control of those resources, particularly land and finances. This has resulted in women’s low level of independence; the– majority of them are abused or remain in abusive relationships due to limited access to productive resources, particularly land, property, and finance.

Growing up as a young woman in Isakamawe village, Misungwi district, Mwanza region, these statements kept ringing in my ears: “I have nowhere to go with my kids because I have no means to support them”; “I can’t leave because I acquired this house with my husband, and even though my name is not on the title, there is no way I can lodge a claim and succeed”; “I can’t report him because he provides for me and the kids;

To date, these are among the justifications for women tolerating violence that has led to disability and sometimes death. The recent Tanzania Gender Assessment Report 2022 shows that 40% of all women aged 15–49 have experienced physical violence. Spousal violence appears to be more prevalent in rural areas, accounting for 52%, while it averages 45% in urban areas.

However, evidence shows that women with secure land rights are less likely to face gender-based violence compared to those with no land rights.

Around the globe, land is foundational for rural, peri-urban, and urban women’s livelihood, security, and shelter. Without land to build or maintain a home; farm; leverage for economic gain; inherit or bequeath; or make decisions on land use, women’s dignity, prosperity, and security remain compromised.

However, unequal access and distribution of land, particularly for women, continue to persist even in countries with progressive laws and policies that recognize, protect, and strengthen women’s land and property rights, like Tanzania. Few women own land in Tanzania, individually or jointly with spouses, despite the provisions of the Land Act no.4 and Village Land Act no. 5 both of 1999 that guarantee women rights to access, own and control land. These laws are also in line with the provisions of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania on right to property Article 24 (1) and prohibition against discrimination as per Article 13.

Discriminatory socio-cultural norms and practices, combined with inadequate policy and law implementation due to a lack of capacity and resources; a lack of understanding of women’s land rights as stipulated in land-related policy and laws by women themselves and communities – particularly men and traditional leaders who mostly uphold discriminatory norms rather than progressive policies; and a lack of access to legal services are among the key barriers that prevent women from achieving their rights.

These barriers and many others perpetrate economic gender-based violence and undermine gender equality and justice as they bar women from accessing, owning, using, and making decisions over land, hence remaining dependent on their male counterparts. These barriers also compromise women’s economic opportunities, deepen poverty, and lead to physical violence.

Thus, societal and structural transformation interventions and campaigns like “Stand for Her Land” are key to addressing barriers perpetrating economic gender-based violence. In Tanzania, the campaign is collaborating with the government, CSOs, and, private sector to address socio-cultural norms and practices that are restricting women from realizing their land rights. The campaign is also supporting women’s economic empowerment by using land as a critical tool for their livelihood enhancement and prosperity. Legal aid services have also been instrumental in supporting economic gender-based violence victims through advice and representation.

It should be noted that economic gender-based violence is a critical factor that must be considered when determining the degree of development of women and the country at large, as it reflects the respect for human rights of women and girls in comparison to their male counterparts in relation to productive resource access, ownership, and control. Therefore, 16 Days of Activism messaging should also focus on ending economic gender-based violence against women to build an equal and just society.

A key message during the on-going commemoration of “16 Days of Activism” is “Secure land rights for women! A safety net for women against gender-based violence.”

Khadija Mrisho is the Land Tenure Specialist at the Landesa Tanzania Office.

Original Media Source

Share this news

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

This Year’s Most Read News Stories

Top News
Investment News Editor

ZSSF money not for projects, says Ali Karume

Unguja. Veteran politician and diplomat Ali Karume has called on authorities of the Zanzibar Revolutionary Government (SMZ) to refrain from using the Zanzibar Social Security Fund money for establishing commercial projects.Continue Reading

Britam half-year net profit hits Sh2bn on higher investment income
Tanzania Foreign Investment News
Chief Editor

Britam half-year net profit hits Sh2bn on higher investment income

Insurer and financial services provider Britam posted a 22.5 percent jump in net earnings for the half-year ended June 2024, to Sh2 billion, buoyed by increased investment income.

The rise in half-year net profit from Sh1.64 billion posted in a similar period last year came on the back of net investment income rising 2.5 times to Sh13.27 billion from Sh5.3 billion.

“We are confident in the growth and performance trend that Britam has achieved, supported by its subsidiaries in Kenya and the region. Our business is expanding its revenue base while effectively managing costs,” Britam Chief Executive Officer Tom Gitogo said.

“Our customer-centric approach is fueling growth in our customer base and product uptake, particularly through micro-insurance, partnerships, and digital channels.”

The investment income growth was fueled by interest and dividend income rising 34 percent to Sh9.1 billion, which the insurer attributed to growth in revenue and the gains from the realignment of the group’s investment portfolio.

Britam also booked a Sh3.79 billion gain on financial assets at a fair value, compared with a Sh1.8 billion loss posted in a similar period last year.

The increased investment income helped offset the 12.7 percent decline in net insurance service result to Sh2.13 billion in the wake of claims paid out rising at a faster pace than that of premiums received.

Britam said insurance revenue, which is money from written premiums, increased to Sh17.8 billion from Sh16.6 billion, primarily driven by growth in the Kenya insurance business and regional general insurance businesses, which contributed 30 percent of the revenue.

The group has a presence in seven countries in Africa namely Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, South Sudan, Mozambique, and Malawi.

Britam’s insurance service expense hit Sh13.6 billion from Sh11.3 billion, while net insurance finance expenses rose 2.6 times to Sh12.3 billion during the same period.

“Net insurance finance expenses increased mainly due to growth in interest cost for the deposit administration business driven by better investment performance. This has also been impacted by a decline in the yield curve, which has led to an increase in the insurance contract liabilities. The increase has been offset by a matching increase in fair value gain on assets,” said Britam.

Britam’s growth in profit is in line with that of other Nairobi Securities Exchange-listed insurers, which have seen a rise in profits.

Jubilee Holdings net profit in the six months increased by 22.7 percent to Sh2.5 billion on increased income from insurance, helping the insurer maintain Sh2 per share interim dividend.

CIC Insurance Group posted a 0.64 percent rise in net profit to Sh709.99 million in the same period as net earnings of Liberty Kenya nearly tripled to Sh632 million from Sh213 million, while Sanlam Kenya emerged from a loss to post a Sh282.2 million net profit.

Continue Reading