Concerns mount over Zanzibar new  travel insurance fee

Concerns mount over Zanzibar new $44 travel insurance fee

Unguja. Tour operators, hoteliers, tourists, and tourism stakeholders are raising alarms over Zanzibar’s new mandatory $44 travel insurance fee, set to take effect on September 1.

Many who spoke to The Citizen argue that this additional charge could significantly impact the island’s tourism sector, making it less competitive compared to other destinations and potentially deterring visitors.

The ministry of tourism and the Zanzibar Commission for Tourism (ZCT) are yet to respond to questions asked regarding this new arrangement and its potential outcome.

The travel insurance fee has been criticized for potentially pushing Zanzibar several steps backward in its tourism revival efforts.

“As a professional marketer and travel consultant specializing in customer preferences, product promotion, and tourism in East Africa, it is evident that the recent decision by the government to impose a hefty additional charge of $44 to enter Zanzibar will likely deter tourists from choosing this destination,” Beth Curtis from Creative Africa Ltd said.

Though she does not see anything wrong with mandatory travel insurance, she notes that destinations like Thailand, which is offering free travel insurance until the end of 2024 to encourage visitors to go there, pose a significant challenge to Zanzibar’s appeal.

In most countries she says all a traveler has to do is to show proof of purchase a travel policy before departure and not necessarily buying from the host country on arrival.

Beth emphasized the importance of understanding how such fees impact consumer behavior and overall competitiveness in the global tourism market.

Others took to social media arguing that the mandatory insurance fee adds an unexpected burden on travellers, many of whom already purchase travel insurance through their banks or other providers.

 “It seems to be just an additional tax on arrival, similar to a visa fee but under a different name,” writes Ryan.

 He believes that while optional travel insurance can be a useful recommendation, forcing its purchase is problematic.

Others have also expressed concern about the timing and implementation of the fee.

“Hopefully, guests who have already booked their flights and hotels will not cancel their trips due to a fee of $44 per person,” remarked one Nungwi. 

He warned that negative reactions on social media from incoming tourists could affect future reservations, potentially leading to a decline in visitors for 2025.

Others have pointed out that the new fee might disproportionately affect families and small groups.

“This means that for a family of four, you need to factor in $400 on top of your hotel and plane tickets.

This is really becoming an expensive destination,” said Jurgen.

He, along with other critics, believes that the combination of this fee and the existing infrastructure tax could push tourists towards more affordable nearby destinations.

Letricia noted that the fee might prevent mass tourism from overwhelming the island.

“If you are a couple, before you even set foot on the island, you have to part with $200,” she said.

However, she acknowledged that this could have broader implications for tourism numbers.

Jenny voiced frustration over the redundancy of the fee. “Most of us already pay for all that in our travel insurance. Now they want us to pay for the same thing twice,” she said.

Meanwhile, Dianna questioned how the insurance would be managed upon arrival and expressed uncertainty about its added value.

Stephen raised concerns about the rationale behind the decision, asking, “How many cases has Zanzibar had over the past year to inform this kind of decision?” He and others are skeptical about the fee’s effectiveness and its justification.

Overall, the reaction to the new travel insurance fee suggests it could have far-reaching consequences for Zanzibar’s tourism industry which is targeting some800,000 international arrivals in 2024.

 Many fear that it will lead to a decrease in visitors, as travellers weigh the added costs against the benefits of alternative destinations.

The announcement

On Thursday authorities announced that visitors travelling to Zanzibar will now have to pay an insurance fee of $44 (about Sh118,360) with effect from September 1.

The fee will cover them for up to 92 days during their stay on the island.

The minister of Finance, Dr Saada Mkuya Salum, explained that this new arrangement aims to enhance services for visitors to Zanzibar.

“The insurance will cover various aspects that have previously been problematic for visitors, such as health, loss of baggage, accidents, emergency evacuation, loss of passports, and even repatriation of remains in case of death,” Dr Mkuya said.

She also mentioned that the government will assign dedicated staff to manage this insurance coverage to streamline service provision.

She emphasised that requiring visitors to pay for insurance is not unique to Zanzibar, as it is a common practice in many other countries.

“This is not a new concept; when we travel elsewhere, we also pay for travel insurance,” she noted.

The insurance coverage will be provided by the Zanzibar Insurance Corporation, a government-owned entity, and will not take into consideration whether one has another travel policy from elsewhere.

Original Media Source

Share this news

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

This Year's Most Read News Stories

Air Tanzania Banned From EU Airspace Due to Safety Concerns
Tanzania Foreign Investment News
Chief Editor

Air Tanzania Banned From EU Airspace Due to Safety Concerns

Several airports have since locked Air Tanzania, dealing a severe blow to the Tanzanian national carrier that must now work overtime to regain its certification or go the wet lease way

The European Commission has announced the inclusion of Air Tanzania on the EU Air Safety List, effectively banning the airline from operating in European airspace.

The decision, made public on December 16, 2024, is based on safety concerns identified by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which also led to the denial of Air Tanzania’s application for a Third Country Operator (TCO) authorisation.

The Commission did not go into the specifics of the safety infringement but industry experts suggest it is possible that the airline could have flown its Airbus A220 well past its scheduled major checks, thus violating the airworthiness directives.

“The decision to include Air Tanzania in the EU Air Safety List underscores our unwavering commitment to ensuring the highest safety standards for passengers in Europe and worldwide,” said Apostolos Tzitzikostas, EU Commissioner for Sustainable Transport and Tourism.

“We strongly urge Air Tanzania to take swift and decisive action to address these safety issues. I have offered the Commission’s assistance to the Tanzanian authorities in enhancing Air Tanzania’s safety performance and achieving full compliance with international aviation standards.”

Air Tanzania has a mixed fleet of modern aircraft types including Boeing 787s, 737 Max jets, and Airbus A220s.

It has been flying the B787 Dreamliner to European destinations like Frankfurt in Germany and Athens in Greece and was looking to add London to its growing list with the A220.

But the ban not only scuppers the London dream but also has seen immediate ripple effect, with several airports – including regional like Kigali and continental – locking out Air Tanzania.

Tanzania operates KLM alongside the national carrier.

The European Commission said Air Tanzania may be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

A wet lease is where an airline pays to use an aircraft with a crew, fuel, and insurance all provided by the leasing company at a fee.

Two more to the list

The EU Air Safety List, maintained to ensure passenger safety, is updated periodically based on recommendations from the EU Air Safety Committee.

The latest revision, which followed a meeting of aviation safety experts in Brussels from November 19 to 21, 2024, now includes 129 airlines.

Of these, 100 are certified in 15 states where aviation oversight is deemed insufficient, and 29 are individual airlines with significant safety deficiencies.

Alongside Air Tanzania, other banned carriers include Air Zimbabwe (Zimbabwe), Avior Airlines (Venezuela), and Iran Aseman Airlines (Iran).

Commenting on the broader implications of the list, Tzitzikostas stated, “Our priority remains the safety of every traveler who relies on air transport. We urge all affected airlines to take these bans seriously and work collaboratively with international bodies to resolve the identified issues.”

In a positive development, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) has been cleared to resume operations in the EU following a four-year suspension. The ban, which began in 2020, was lifted after substantial improvements in safety performance and oversight by PIA and the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA).

“Since the TCO Authorisation was suspended, PIA and PCAA have made remarkable progress in enhancing safety standards,” noted Tzitzikostas. “This demonstrates that safety issues can be resolved through determination and cooperation.”

Another Pakistani airline, Airblue Limited, has also received EASA’s TCO authorisation.

Decisions to include or exclude airlines from the EU Air Safety List are based on rigorous evaluations of international safety standards, particularly those established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

The process involves thorough review and consultation among EU Member State aviation safety experts, with oversight from the European Commission and support from EASA.

“Where an airline currently on the list believes it complies with the required safety standards, it can request a reassessment,” explained Tzitzikostas. “Our goal is not to penalize but to ensure safety compliance globally.”

Airlines listed on the EU Air Safety List face significant challenges to their international operations, as the bans highlight shortcomings in safety oversight by their home regulatory authorities.

For Air Tanzania, this inclusion signals an urgent need for reform within Tanzania’s aviation sector to address these deficiencies and align with global standards.

The path forward will require immediate and sustained efforts to rectify safety concerns and regain access to one of the world’s most critical aviation markets.

Source: allafrica.com

Continue Reading