SA Speaker turns herself INTO police; women are now good bread EARNERS

By:
On:
In: Uncategorized

The preposition, if we’re to remind our colleagues again, is a word or group of words used before a noun, pronoun or noun phrase to show direction, time, place, location, special relationships or to introduce a subject. We’re talking words like: by, for, to, into, “in to,” which, at and with.

Prepositions are highly idiomatic, so their usage is fixed—that is, you aren’t allowed to alter or use one differently from the way the indigenous speakers use it!

Now on Page 9 of Bongo’s senior-most broadsheet of Friday, April 5, there’s a story whose headline is thus written: ‘South Africa parliament speaker turns herself INTO police.’

A reader who pointed out this goof to us, one Ali Makengo of Dar, said the first impression he got was that the beleaguered SA Parliament boss is interfering with the work of the country’s police!

However, that wasn’t the case, because things became clearer when Makengo checked the intro, for it read:

“South Africa’s Speaker parliament Nosiviwe Mapisa-Ngaqula has handed herself OVER to the police a day after she resigned over corruption allegations.”

It means the Speaker freely walked to a police station and said something like this: Hey, cops; here I’m and ready to record a statement in regard to the malicious rumours indicating I’m a bad person!

It means the sub-editor should’ve written the headline to read thus: ‘South Africa parliament turns herself IN (not into) TO police.’

Back to Page 5 of the broadsheet, where there’s a story whose headline is written this way: ‘TARURA constructs 826 kms ROADS’ network in Kagera.’

“Roads’ network” would mean a network belonging to roads, which would be nonsensical, of course! We’re certain the sub-editor meant to write: ‘TARURA constructs 826km ROAD network…’

In Para 3 the scribbler reports: “TARURA Regional Manager…said in the three-YEARS period, the budget allocated for roads improved…”

Three-years period? Nope! We say three-YEAR period, for as we keep noting here, when a noun is used as a qualifier, you don’t pluralise it.

On the same page, there’s another story entitled, ‘REO warns against denying girls education’.

In this story, the scribbler reports in Para 3: “Expounding, he said nowadays most women have become good leaders and bread EARNERS…”

No siree! When someone earns a meaningful income and becomes the key provider of a household, he or she isn’t called the bread earner; he or she is called the BREADWINNER (one word).

Page 8 comprises a picture spread entitled, ‘Samia swears in new Government officials.” One of the pictures has a caption that reads:

“High Court of Tanzania Sylvester Kainda ‘with’ A Bible (sic!) takes oath of office at State House in Dar es Salaam yesterday.”

A Bible? Hey, No! We say THE Bible, because this holy book is just one which, according to believers, carries the word of God. You may talk of a “copy of the Bible.” Or a new and different version of the Bible! And Judge Kainda is not “with” the Bible; he’s HOLDING the Bible.

Let’s move on to Saturday, April 6, on which day Bongo’s huge and colourful broadsheet carries a story on Page 5 entitled, ‘Govt to construct four modern facilities for cancer treatment.’

Reporting in regard to what a minister said, the scribbler writes in Para 4:

“She was responding to a question by Tunza Malapo (Special Seats MP) who wanted to know plans by the Government to improve cancer treatment SERVICES in the country.”

The capped word, services, is a qualifier that adds no value the phrase “cancer treatment.” It’s a sheer waste of print paper space!

On Page 14 of the broadsheet, there’s a story headlined, ‘Firm boosts production with advanced hatchery tech,’ in which the scribbler tells readers:

“Information provided to this journalist HAS THAT the Silversands hatchery project included the implementation of cutting-edge technology…”

Information…has that? A-a! We say “…information has IT that…”

Ah, this treacherous language called English!

Send your photos and linguistic gems to email abdisul244@gmail.com or WhatsApp on Tel No 0688315580Continue Reading

Zephania Ubwani: A writer through and through

By:
On:
In: Uncategorized

Ardent followers of international news should by this time have noticed that in big press conferences at the White House in Washington, 10 Downing Street in London and in developed countries in general, it is usually senior, long-serving reporters who ask questions. No wonder they normally ask tough and probing questions.

In contrast, press conferences in Tanzania are usually dominated by young journalists, some of whom are still very early in their careers.

This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it would have been much better if a sizeable number of veteran journalists were in their midst to provide them with on-the-job coaching, or mentoring.

It’s thus not surprising that sometimes there is a general lack of institutional memory that would have enabled greenhorns in journalism to connect the dots and probe from an informed point of view.

This scenario is not by accident. It is by design. Unlike in the West, where a senior journalist can be well compensated at times even more than their editor because of their being authoritative and highly competent, it is a different story in Africa.

To get a raise, you have to be given a leadership role that would justify the increment.

So, more often than not, we end up promoting people to their highest levels of incompetence in this part of the world.

You give me a promotion to justify a raise, but what you don’t know is that while I may be very good in my field, I could be terrible at managing people.

I might be very intelligent, with a very high IQ, but very low on Emotional Intelligence. And once I ascend to that position, my belief is that I have a monopoly of knowledge and skills to solve everything. My word is absolute. Remember, I’m the “boss”. Right? Wrong!

We become arrogant. We don’t engage much. We want to prove ourselves. Our word is law.

While that doesn’t necessarily kill one’s expertise immediately, such a person will over time lose touch with their field as they continue to be an obstacle to their team’s success.

One of my media leadership professors at Rhodes University, Sol Plaatje Institute, in Grahamstown, South Africa, where I attended a short course in Media Leadership and Management back in 2011, had this to say in reference to the mistake most newsrooms in Africa tend to make when they promote a great reporter to an editor (manager): “We end up killing a great journalist and creating a terrible manager.”

When Nation Media Group bought a controlling stake in Mwananchi Communications Limited in the early 2000s, it facilitated the establishment of an English daily going by the name of The Citizen.

I was privileged to be the newspaper’s first Business Editor when it was launched on September 16, 2004.

The late Zephania Ubwani, aka “Zeph”, who died last weekend in Arusha, was among the first journalists to join The Citizen. He was hired on September 1, 2004, two months after I came on board, to be precise.

So, being a business writer-cum-editor, I related very well to business and economy writers, including Zeph.

Looking back at my relatively short stint as the first Business Editor of The Citizen (2004–2006), I might as well blow my own trumpet and conclude that I was perhaps one of only a handful of business editors who presided over a team of highly dynamic, enthusiastic and enterprising business writers in the history of business reporting among English dailies in East Africa.

We had Zeph, who was very authoritative when it came to EAC and Great Lakes Region affairs; Richard Mgamba reporting from Mwanza on mining and fishing; Costantine Sebastian and Finnigan wa Simbeye specialising in corporate and economic news; statistician Hassan Mghenyi (RIP) with daily economic indicators and last but not least Damas Kanyabwoya and Imani Lwinga forming the “starting lineup”, if you like.

Some up-and-coming business journalists in the team included Samuel Kamndaya, Mnaku Mbani, Muganyizi Muta (RIP) and Dickson Amos Ng’hily.

I grew up on the job, appreciating Zeph’s journalistic acumen. After two years, I was promoted to serve as Managing Editor of The Citizen.

In reconstituting the team, I was tempted to commit the well-documented sin of giving him a raise and justifying it by making him an editor and moving him to Dar es Salaam. I thought he would receive it kwa mikono miwili. Wapii!

Zeph flatly refused and opted to remain a writer. I lost my proposition.

We managed to boost his compensation, but not to the level I wished him to enjoy and he worked as Bureau Chief for Arusha/Mwanza, something that gave him ample time to keep doing what he loved most – writing.

The surprising thing is that he was happy and even more committed.

Fast forward and I transitioned to leading the newsroom as MCL Executive Editor and later on as CEO.

Meanwhile, Zeph had retired, but he was not tired of writing.

So, it was just natural that the editors of the time would find it necessary to deploy their knowledge and expertise in continuing to produce the content that counts.

And as we all heard, at 70 years of age, the cruel hand of death snatched Zeph while he was doing what he loved with a passion – gathering news and writing!

My heart goes out to his widow, children, family, professional family and the East African Community, which has lost a committed journalist who covered the EAC extensively and exhaustively.

Go well, brother.

You left a mark, at least on my life as a journalist.

Bakari S. Machumu is the Managing Director of Mwananchi Communications Limited (MCL)Continue Reading

Why ‘Kwibuka’ matters to Tanzanians

By:
On:
In: Uncategorized

By Fatou Harerimana

On April 7, Rwanda will mark 30 years since the Genocide against the Tutsi. “Kwibuka”, which means to remember, is an annual period of solemn reflection when we come together to honour the victims, unite in our collective grief and renew our commitment to continue to build a better future for all Rwandans.

This important act of preserving memory, and ensuring the accurate re-telling of history, matters to Rwandans. And though it might not be immediately apparent, it is also important to Tanzanians. The international community played a part in the tragedy while the world watched it unfold. Every nation can benefit from reflecting on the lessons from this preventable genocide borne of division and hatred.

Thirty years ago, in 100 days over one million Tutsi were murdered just because they were Tutsi. Hutus who opposed the genocidal government were also killed. This ‘crime of crimes’ happened in plain sight. The international community were, at best, indifferent to the horrific violence, with some countries being complicit in the killings.

No one came to Rwanda’s aid. The slaughter was only halted when the Rwandan Patriotic Front took Kigali and defeated the genocidaires. The Genocide showed what can happen when an ideology built on hatred is allowed to flourish unchecked by those with the power to intervene.

Although foreign governments and international institutions failed Rwanda in our greatest hour of need, there were many brave foreigners on the ground who made heroic contributions.

For example, in 2009, the founding father of Tanzania, Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere was posthumously decorated with “Umurinzi” (“the Guardian”) medal, Rwanda’s Campaign against Genocide Medal, which was received by Mama Maria Nyerere on his behalf.

When the world impassively watched as the Genocide against the Tutsi peaked in Rwanda, Mwalimu Nyerere was among the very few voices of reason who denounced the killers outright, recognizing and calling the genocide by its true name.

Internationally, New Zealand, Nigeria and the Czech Republic used their positions on the UN Security Council to press for the institution to take action. Permanent Representative Colin Keating (New Zealand) and Chief Delegate Prof Ibrahim Gambari (Nigeria) put forward separate resolutions calling for greater troop deployment and for the troops to be given a mandate to save civilians. Ambassador Karel Kovanda joined the calls for greater action and was also the first person to use the term genocide within the security council when describing what was happening. These few voices did what they could to raise the alarm with a world that was choosing not to listen.

Beyond remembering the individual stories, this significant commemoration provides an opportunity for the world to reflect on the lessons of the Genocide and the battle to preserve the integrity of the historical accounts of it.

There has been a concerted effort to deny the Genocide happened in the way we know it did. These genocide deniers use various tactics, ranging from questioning the numbers of victims – despite having no evidence to contradict the verified figures – to blaming the victims for causing the Genocide. They even go as far as creating false equivalencies by suggesting a double genocide took place.

These tactics are not new. They have been deployed by perpetrators and deniers of other genocides such as the Holocaust. But if we are not careful, this distortion of historical facts – supercharged by social media and AI tools now in the hands of deniers – could be deployed across the world turning true history into contested debate.

Rwanda’s history has shaped Rwandan shared identity – this is why the historical clarity about the Genocide against the Tutsi is of national and international importance

The memorials Rwanda maintains (four of which have been designated UNESCO world heritage sites) are vital to anchoring the truth, and truth is essential to reconciliation and renewal. The artefacts we preserve are our evidence, and the stories we tell are witness testimony.

Our collective memory also provides the world with a warning that the ideology which drove the Genocide must not be allowed to flourish and spread ever again. This is unfortunately happening today just beyond Rwanda’s borders.

On April 7 and beyond, we ask that Tanzania stand in solidarity with Rwanda. We ask that you do this to honour the memory of all Rwandans who lost their lives, and Mwalimu Julius Kambarage Nyerere and others who did their best to help during Rwanda’s darkest hour. And we ask for your solidarity in preserving the true account of Rwanda’s history so that the world can match the words ‘never again’ with tangible action to prevent history from repeating itself.

Fatou Harerimana is Rwanda’s High Commissioner to TanzaniaContinue Reading